<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for A Timely Reform by Ian Ridley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ianridley.org.uk/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ianridley.org.uk</link>
	<description>Blog &#38; web site of Ian Ridley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 08:25:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on That Pensions Statement by Ian</title>
		<link>http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=293&#038;cpage=1#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 08:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=293#comment-376</guid>
		<description>Do you agree there is a funding gap between pension provision and pension costs? How would you solve it? How would Plaid?

I agree some thought needs to be put towards the idea of 65 year old nurses and classroom teachers still plying their trade. Is that a good idea? I don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you agree there is a funding gap between pension provision and pension costs? How would you solve it? How would Plaid?</p>
<p>I agree some thought needs to be put towards the idea of 65 year old nurses and classroom teachers still plying their trade. Is that a good idea? I don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on That Pensions Statement by Philip</title>
		<link>http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=293&#038;cpage=1#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 23:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=293#comment-374</guid>
		<description>For me though, the last straw....... No more Lib Dems left on my Town Council! Plaid here I come. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me though, the last straw&#8230;&#8230;. No more Lib Dems left on my Town Council! Plaid here I come. <img src='http://ianridley.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Petition: Lib Dems against a rise in Tuition Fees by Ian</title>
		<link>http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=242&#038;cpage=1#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 09:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=242#comment-317</guid>
		<description>The petition link should be   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/universityforall&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.ipetitions.com/petition/universityforall&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The petition link should be   <a href="http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/universityforall" rel="nofollow">http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/universityforall</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Petition: Lib Dems against a rise in Tuition Fees by Rachel</title>
		<link>http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=242&#038;cpage=1#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=242#comment-311</guid>
		<description>www.ipetitions.co.uk/petition/universityforall

I am incredibly against removing the cap on tuition fees. I was thoroughly proud that, in England, it cost you the same amount to do any degree even in Oxbridge, something which resulted in equality amongst applicants, allowing a greater diversity within England&#039;s best Universities. I was also proud of all the widenening access schemes England&#039;s top ranked Universities have launched over the past few years, all of which shouting about how you don&#039;t need money to get into their prestigious organisation, you just needed talent and potential.

All of this, apparantly, was in vain. Now, applicants&#039; options will be divided by price. Redbrick Unis will undoubtedly raise their fees to the maximum, if given the chance, excluding most middle and working class applicants. A huge social divide will split Britain. Education will once again be for the wealthy.

Unless we manage to stop it. Or, at least, let them know that we will oppose the changes to the very last.
Please sign my petition. With enough signatures, I will send it to all the media outlets I can find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ipetitions.co.uk/petition/universityforall" rel="nofollow">http://www.ipetitions.co.uk/petition/universityforall</a></p>
<p>I am incredibly against removing the cap on tuition fees. I was thoroughly proud that, in England, it cost you the same amount to do any degree even in Oxbridge, something which resulted in equality amongst applicants, allowing a greater diversity within England&#8217;s best Universities. I was also proud of all the widenening access schemes England&#8217;s top ranked Universities have launched over the past few years, all of which shouting about how you don&#8217;t need money to get into their prestigious organisation, you just needed talent and potential.</p>
<p>All of this, apparantly, was in vain. Now, applicants&#8217; options will be divided by price. Redbrick Unis will undoubtedly raise their fees to the maximum, if given the chance, excluding most middle and working class applicants. A huge social divide will split Britain. Education will once again be for the wealthy.</p>
<p>Unless we manage to stop it. Or, at least, let them know that we will oppose the changes to the very last.<br />
Please sign my petition. With enough signatures, I will send it to all the media outlets I can find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Pupil Premium must not be used to paper over education cuts by Ian</title>
		<link>http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=136&#038;cpage=1#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=136#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Liberal Democrat General Election Manifesto p34,
&lt;em&gt;&quot;...Increase the funding of the most disadvantaged pupils, around one million children. We will invest £2.5 billion in this ‘Pupil Premium’ to boost education opportunities for every child. This is additional money going into the schools budget, and headteachers will be free to spend it in the best interests of children.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal Democrat General Election Manifesto p34,<br />
<em>&#8220;&#8230;Increase the funding of the most disadvantaged pupils, around one million children. We will invest £2.5 billion in this ‘Pupil Premium’ to boost education opportunities for every child. This is additional money going into the schools budget, and headteachers will be free to spend it in the best interests of children.&#8221;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Pupil Premium must not be used to paper over education cuts by Nich Starling - Norfolk Blogger</title>
		<link>http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=136&#038;cpage=1#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Nich Starling - Norfolk Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 22:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=136#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s not claim the pupil premium as a success of the coalition agreement. It was a Tory policy anyway, so claiming credit for this is ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not claim the pupil premium as a success of the coalition agreement. It was a Tory policy anyway, so claiming credit for this is ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lose the sound bites, lose the coalition &#8220;line&#8221; by JohnM</title>
		<link>http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=122&#038;cpage=1#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=122#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Good post!  I agree that we have been quite meek in our stance on the coalition agreement.  I accept the VAT rise as part of the agreement but the message to our detractors should be that - if only we had got more votes for our policies then the agreement might have been weighted more in our favour and instead of a VAT rise it might have been limiting pension tax relief to the basic rate.

Equally, we lack the necessary combative counter attacks against blatantly irresponsible attacks by political foes.  I hate to see one of our MP&#039;s being mauled on QuestionTime, for instance, for the lack of a good put down.  A Labour, SNP or Green spokesperson might attack us for spending cuts and I want our representative to say something like &quot;no, how can you imply an income tax rise on these people to pay for this spending&quot;  or &quot;look most people and businesses are just hanging on because interest rates are at a low - you seem to be blasé about rates rising&quot; etc etc!

I&#039;d like to make a little pocket book of retorts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post!  I agree that we have been quite meek in our stance on the coalition agreement.  I accept the VAT rise as part of the agreement but the message to our detractors should be that &#8211; if only we had got more votes for our policies then the agreement might have been weighted more in our favour and instead of a VAT rise it might have been limiting pension tax relief to the basic rate.</p>
<p>Equally, we lack the necessary combative counter attacks against blatantly irresponsible attacks by political foes.  I hate to see one of our MP&#8217;s being mauled on QuestionTime, for instance, for the lack of a good put down.  A Labour, SNP or Green spokesperson might attack us for spending cuts and I want our representative to say something like &#8220;no, how can you imply an income tax rise on these people to pay for this spending&#8221;  or &#8220;look most people and businesses are just hanging on because interest rates are at a low &#8211; you seem to be blasé about rates rising&#8221; etc etc!</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to make a little pocket book of retorts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lose the sound bites, lose the coalition &#8220;line&#8221; by Mike</title>
		<link>http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=122&#038;cpage=1#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=122#comment-152</guid>
		<description>I would guess the Mansion tax was inserted for the same reason that Clegg made a lot of noise about how immediate cuts would be economic masochism- as something the Tories would be especially loath to agree to, and would therefore concede more to the Lib Dems in order to get rid of them. It didn&#039;t seem like something Cable had his heart in at the time it was belatedly announced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would guess the Mansion tax was inserted for the same reason that Clegg made a lot of noise about how immediate cuts would be economic masochism- as something the Tories would be especially loath to agree to, and would therefore concede more to the Lib Dems in order to get rid of them. It didn&#8217;t seem like something Cable had his heart in at the time it was belatedly announced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lose the sound bites, lose the coalition &#8220;line&#8221; by Steven Bate</title>
		<link>http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=122&#038;cpage=1#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=122#comment-151</guid>
		<description>I fully agree with this, if the Lib Dem Ministers should start every response to every broadcast interview with &quot; We Lib Dems would have prefered ..... but the Tories would not and they demanded .....&quot; I they do not do that from now on we are stuffed at the local elections on May 5th. The people in Anchorsholme Ward Blackpool deserve rid of the useless Tory&#039;s that knocked us off the Council in May 2007. We can get almost double the national Lib Dem poll rating but not more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree with this, if the Lib Dem Ministers should start every response to every broadcast interview with &#8221; We Lib Dems would have prefered &#8230;.. but the Tories would not and they demanded &#8230;..&#8221; I they do not do that from now on we are stuffed at the local elections on May 5th. The people in Anchorsholme Ward Blackpool deserve rid of the useless Tory&#8217;s that knocked us off the Council in May 2007. We can get almost double the national Lib Dem poll rating but not more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Questions Newsnight Didn&#8217;t Ask by Tweets that mention The Questions Newsnight Didn’t Ask « A Timely Reform by Ian Ridley -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=129&#038;cpage=1#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Questions Newsnight Didn’t Ask « A Timely Reform by Ian Ridley -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=129#comment-36</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Chris Wiggin, Rachel Smith and Andrea Gill, Ian Ridley. Ian Ridley said: New Blog Post &quot;The Questions Newsnight Didn’t Ask&quot; http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=129 #fb [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Chris Wiggin, Rachel Smith and Andrea Gill, Ian Ridley. Ian Ridley said: New Blog Post &quot;The Questions Newsnight Didn’t Ask&quot; <a href="http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=129" rel="nofollow">http://ianridley.org.uk/?p=129</a> #fb [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

