A Timely Reform by Ian Ridley

Blog & web site of Ian Ridley

Conference Media Pick – Sunday

September 20th, 2010

TV cameraVideo

iPlayer (only available for 7 days) is your friend for:

Audio / Podcasts

Articles/ Blogs

Conference – Sunday, a day of Two Halves

September 19th, 2010

Throughout Conference I will try to give an armchair view on how things are going in Liverpool.

Today had good morning….

  • Danny Alexander announced that the coaltion will implement a crack down on tax evasion -a Lib Dem manifesto policy. I really like the way he labelled tax dodging as an unacceptable lifestyle choice – it takes money away from those who need it the most and is “morally indefensible”. This is a £900 million investment in more resources (I assume for HMRC) that should net £7 billion a year by 2015. I just hope it works. Many governments have promised similar crackdowns but the extra investment indicates that the government means business;
  • Lord (Tony) Greaves called for new rules to replace “collective responsibility” in Government decision-making so that Lib Dem Ministers are able to set out Lib Dem policies and give more transparency as to how compromise policies are made;
  • David Rendel said that the leadership pretended every policy was agreed by both sides because they “seem terrified of the tabloid stories that they might get about splits in the coalition”;

…followed by a poorer afternoon as Jill Hope (candidate here in Harborough in 2001 and 2005) asked Nick Clegg if Lib Dem ministers could say when they disagree with the policies they’re having to implement. This seemed to me to be a similar approach to ending the collective responsibility suggested by Tony Greaves.

Nick replied it would be crazy and wrong for him to pick a synthetic row with David Cameron simply to show he’s still a Lib Dem.

A simplistic answer that did not allay my fears.

On a better note, the Federal Lib Dem web site reports that Andrew Stunell, the Communities and Local Government Minister announced this evening that the Standards Board for local councillors will be axed. This has led to some petty local vendettas stopping good local councillors properly representing their areas.

Instead, serious misconduct for personal gain by councillors will be a criminal act.

The Pupil Premium must not be used to paper over education cuts

September 16th, 2010

School signSarah Teather (Lib Dem Minister of State for Children ad Families) is rightly publicising the “Pupil Premium” policy of the coalition government. The policy is a Lib Dem manifesto commitment that forms part of the coalition agreement.

The premium is a (as yet unspecified) sum of money that will be attached to individual pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds. These funds will be allocated to the school where each pupil is taught and the Headteacher will be able to decide how best to spend the money to help the pupil’s education.

Sarah Teather has stressed that the funding for this policy will come from outside the schools budget. So it should be additional money for schools with pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds.

The Pupil Premium has the extra refinement of being attached to the pupil wherever they go to school.

However there are several initiatives already in place that direct money towards these and other pupils struggling in school. Examples include “One to One” tuition for pupils that need extra help with English and Maths and the more broad-brush allocation of funds to local authorities based on deprivation.

The “One to One” funding has not been guaranteed beyond March 2011 and other budget cuts are already beginning to be felt. For example, in Leicester there will be £50,000 less in the Educational Psychologist budget this year.

It is likely that Head Teachers will have full discretion on how the Pupil Premium is spent. So it very probable that any extra funds that schools get this way will be used to make up for cuts elsewhere.

There is a real danger that the Pupil Preimum will not improve the lot (relative to the pre-election situation) of the children it is targeted at. Instead it will be used to paper over the cuts across the school budget.