A Timely Reform by Ian Ridley

Blog & web site of Ian Ridley

That Iraq Enquiry Vote in Full

November 1st, 2006

So Labour won the vote to reject last night’s motion in the Commons on whether to have an enquiry into the Government’s conduct in the run-up to the Iraq war.

But Labour’s majority of 25 disguises several interesting voting patterns.

Firstly, this was an Opposition Day debate. Labour MPs who do not agree with Blair are more reluctant to vote for a motion led by an opposition party. This was particularly applicable last night, with the SNP and Plaid Cymru moving the motion and the Welsh and Scottish Parliamentary elections due in 6 months. Potential Labour rebels were reluctant to vote in a way that would give credit to the Nationalists.

Next, the Tories have brass necks. Having joined Labour in 2003 in backing the Iraq war, they put a two-line whip on backing the enquiry last nght. This amounts to a “not quite pulling out all the stops” approach to getting their MPs out to vote. I rather think had the Tories been in power in 2003, they would have taken the same decisions as Blair and would be as obstructive to an enquiry now.

So the vote went 298 to 273. The Public Whip helpfully analyses the vote in a way that puts Hansard to shame. Looking at the Public Whip’s data I find:

  • 12 Labour MPs voted for the enquiry – well done to them for putting expediency aside and voting with principle;
  • 1 Labour MP went through both lobbies (David Taylor of NW Leics) – this may have been to cancel out a mistaken vote or to register an absention;
  • 41 Labour MPs were either absent or abstained;
  • 14 Tory MPs were either absent or abstained;
  • 59 Lib Dem MPs voted for the enquiry, the remaining 4 were either absent or abstained;
  • 3 Democratic Unionist MPs were either absent or abstained;
  • 1 Plaid Cymru MP was either absent or abstained (Elfyn Llwyd of Meirionnydd Nant Conwy).

What does this mean?

MPs may have abstained because they were ill, “paired” due unavoidable committments or because they chose not to vote. I suspect many of the 41 Labour non-shows and not a few of the 14 Tories fall into the latter category.

I haven’t much time for those Labour MPs who want an enquiry but couldn’t bring themselves to vote for a Nationalist- sponsored motion. What is more important? How things might appear to voters or the reality of the Iraq War?

The deliberate Tory stay-aways just reflect their muddle on this issue. They backed the government on Iraq whilst the Lib Dems, with access to the same information, chose to oppose. Now the Tories have no clear idea what to do about the situation: Back Labour’s line? Call for an enquiry? They are rudderless on the issue.

The Lib Dems and the Nationlists put nearly all of their Parliamentary numbers behind the call for a much needed enquiry. The motion may have carried with half a dozen or so more Tories, a couple more DUP MPs and a dozen more Labour MPs putting their principles before perception.

Instead the Government is still not properly held to account for the deception of why Iraq was invaded. And we cannot learn the much-needed lessons that might stop the same mistakes being made again.

Those “rebels” & absentees/abstainers:

Labour MPs voting for the enquiry:

Harry Cohen Leyton & Wanstead
Jeremy Corbyn Islington North
Mark Fisher Stoke-on-Trent Central
Roger Godsiff Birmingham, Sparkbrook & Small Heath
Glenda Jackson Hampstead & Highgate
Robert Marshall-Andrews Medway
John McDonnell Hayes & Harlington
Alan Simpson Nottingham South
Peter Soulsby Leicester South
Gavin Strang Edinburgh East
Robert Wareing Liverpool, West Derby
Mike Wood Batley & Spen

Tories who didn’t vote:

Michael Ancram Devizes
James Arbuthnot North East Hampshire
John Bercow Buckingham
Alistair Burt North East Bedfordshire
Patrick Cormack South Staffordshire
Quentin Davies Grantham & Stamford
Adam Holloway Gravesham
Mark Lancaster North East Milton Keynes
Julian Lewis New Forest East
Ian Liddell-Grainger Bridgwater
Michael Mates East Hampshire
Laurence Robertson Tewkesbury
Grant Shapps Welwyn Hatfield
David Willetts Havant

Labour MPs who didn’t vote:

Diane Abbott Hackney North & Stoke Newington
John Austin Erith & Thamesmead
Vera Baird Redcar
David Borrow South Ribble
Lyn Brown West Ham
Martin Caton Gower
Ben Chapman Wirral South
David Chaytor Bury North
Frank Cook Stockton North
David Crausby Bolton North East
Claire Curtis-Thomas Crosby
Frank Dobson Holborn & St Pancras
Paul Flynn Newport West
Hywel Francis Aberavon
Linda Gilroy Plymouth, Sutton
Nigel Griffiths Edinburgh South
Dai Havard Merthyr Tydfil & Rhymney
David Heyes Ashton-under-Lyne
Kate Hoey Vauxhall
Kelvin Hopkins Luton North
Brian Jenkins Tamworth
Lynne Jones Birmingham, Selly Oak
Gerald Kaufman Manchester, Gorton
Peter Kilfoyle Liverpool, Walton
Tony Lloyd Manchester Central
John MacDougall Glenrothes
Judy Mallaber Amber Valley
Ian McCartney Makerfield
Michael Meacher Oldham West & Royton
Julie Morgan Cardiff North
Paul Murphy Torfaen
Gordon Prentice Pendle
Mohammad Sarwar Glasgow Central
Angela Smith Sheffield, Hillsborough
Geraldine Smith Morecambe & Lunesdale
John Smith Vale of Glamorgan
Graham Stringer Manchester, Blackley
Dari Taylor Stockton South
Emily Thornberry Islington South & Finsbury
Shaun Woodward St Helens South
Tony Wright Cannock Chase

Lib Dems who didn’t vote:

A J Beith Berwick-upon-Tweed
Evan Harris Oxford West & Abingdon
Paul Rowen Rochdale
Jennifer Willott Cardiff Central

DUP MPs who didn’t vote:

Jeffrey M Donaldson Lagan Valley
William McCrea South Antrim
David Simpson Upper Bann

Chips ‘n’ bins: liberals and environmentalism

September 4th, 2006

I have been a little taken aback at some dissenting voices from fellow liberals on environmental policies such as:

  • charging people for the weight of recyclable waste they produce;
  • taxing high polluting cars;
  • introducing a system to discourage a wasteful “standby” mode on electrical appliances

Liberals need to position themselves somewhere on the divide between allowing people to become voluntarily environmentally responsible and using compulsion.

We need to start by making it easy to be environmentally responsible. Once these measures in place we need to use tax to penalise polluters and those who generate excessive un-recyclable waste.

Looking at the landfill/incinerator waste issue, helpfully sensationalised as a Bugs in Binsstory by the Mail on Sunday, we still need to:

  • bring kerbside collection of all recyclables to all houses that currently have a landfill waste collection;
  • legislate to reduce unnecessary waste packaging, encourage the use of recyclable packaging and ensure all recyclable packaging is clearly identified. Most of my landfill waste is unrecyclable plastic nowadays (my local council collects types 1 to 3 but a lot of packaging does not display the type of plastic).

Once these are in place then we can look at charging people by the amount of non-recyclable waste that they produce. This would assume that a workable system could be found. For a starter it would have to be an individual allowance rather than a household one. There are plenty of practical problems that might arise – increased fly-tipping, neighbours using each others’ bins. I thought some EU countries had systems in place but cannot find anything on the net.

So my concerns about weighing rubbish are more practical than liberal. Can all householders easily recycle waste and compostable material? Are manufacturers being forced to reduce packaging and use recycleable materials? And finally, can a weighing system work?

“Liberal” arguments against weighing rubbish or a tax on polluting cars or taxing those manufacturers who insist on keeping a wasteful “standby” button on your TV do not impress me. In fact, I’d class these as more coming from a libertarian perspective – an argument for small or non-existent government overriding environmental concern

Mill wrote, “the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.” This is often seen as shorthand for modern liberalism.

By unsustainably polluting the planet, we are all harming each other. This needs to be tackled by compulsion as well as enabling people to be more environmentally responsible. The devil in the environment is in the detail: 3 or 4 appliances left on standby in one home may add up to hardly anything in the UK’s energy budget but multiply that by tens of millions of homes….

Calling a chip in a bin a “bug” is a good old Wail sensationalism. It’s no more a bug than getting your pet microchipped. Like your pet, the chip in the bin stores which property the bin comes from. It does not transmit weight, sound or other dynamic data.

Bromley By-election Today

June 29th, 2006

Bromley & Chislehurst polls today, as does Blaenau Gwent. Both are electing new MPs to replace Eric Forth (Con) & Peter Law (Ind) who recently passed away. Blaenau Gwent is also electing a new Member of the Welsh Assembly.

Blaenau Gwent appears to be a contest between the Independents and Labour, with the latter throwing everything they can into the constituency. The Lib Dems came 3rd in 2005 and will be looking to build on this position.

Bromley is the latest test for the new Tory leader and their campaign there is looking suprisingly wobbly. Having made no impact in Dunfermline & West Fife the Tories did fairly well at the May local elections, althought their performance was far from sweeping and there was a lot of churn in seats between all 3 main parties and several smaller ones too.

Historically, the Lib Dems do not fair well in byelections where the Opposition is incumbent. Romsey and Bermondsey are the few recent examples where they have won. The Tories have held Uxbridge, Beckenham, South Staffs, Eddisbury and Kensington and Chelsea since they went into opposition in 1997. Romsey is the only one of these Tory defences where the Lib Dems both started from a good base (29.4%) and went on to win.

However in Bromley and Chislehurst the Lib Dems are starting from their best base since Romsey, having polled above 20% in the preceding General Election. Their campaign appears to have built up some momentum and the Tories have gifted plenty of ammunition to their opponents. UKIP are also weighing in with their own campaign, threatening the Tories
with legal action.

The Lib Dems do pull off big by-elections wins from time to time but if the Tories are really serious about building up a head of steam under their new leader they should be getting the sort of thumping by-election defences that Labour got in the early 90s.

There should not be even a sniff of a Romsey in the air. Yet there is.